Phrasing vs Bracketing Labels
I’ve noticed the Phrasing modules and Bracketing Modules have different labels.
However when looking in different books that discuss Phrasing, such as Andy Naselli’s how to interpret and understand the new testament, the labels they use for phrasing are similar to those used in bracketing. Why do BibleArc use different labels? Wouldn’t it be easier to keep the labels consistent?
Hope this makes some sense 
@mylifeandbooks Those are the exact charts you should use!
I understand what you mean by labels, I believe, and one reason why they are different is because Bracketing labels both propositions (usually), as in Action-Manner. But in Phrasing, we only label the subordinate phrase. Thus the labels will be a little different.
Does that answer your question?
@mylifeandbooks What do you mean by “labels”? In Bracketing there are preselected symbols for the relationship labels (like Ac-Mn, Id-Exp, and so on). But Phrasing doesn’t have labels in the same way; just a spot to write out the relationships on the right margin.
And in both courses, many of the same relationships are taught, although Bracketing has some relationships that Phrasing doesn’t have.
Can you clarify further? Thanks!
Hey!
Yes I see what you mean, I by labels I mean for example, what we find under the “Support By Restatement” category, i.e. :
For Bracketing :
“Action-Manner”
“Comparisson”
“Negative-Positive”
“Idea-Explanation”
“Question-Answer”
For Phrasing :
Manner
Comparison
Negative
Explanation
I used these charts as a reference
I’m probably just confusing myself ha
@Brent-Karding Yea, I see what you mean.
Thanks a lot
@Brent-Karding said in Phrasing vs Bracketing Labels:
And in both courses, many of the same relationships are taught, although Bracketing has some relationships that Phrasing doesn’t have.
And, of course, Phrasing also has quite a few relationship (or “sub-relationships”) which Bracketing does not have. You can see these in @mylifeandbooks’s post.
